Industries
Built from the pain points in, not the workflow diagram down.
The agents are organized around the decisions that cost money in a specific operation, rather than around an industry-standard process map. These four are where our team came from and where the deployments are.
Food & protein
Food, protein and perishables
Beef and protein processing · Dairy · Bakery · Produce and fresh · Prepared foods · Beverage
See the three agents →
Industrial manufacturing
Industrial and discrete manufacturing
Industrial equipment · Automotive and vehicle components · Electrical and electronics · Building products · Metals and fabrication · Plastics and packaging
See the three agents →
Distribution
Distribution and wholesale
Industrial distribution · Building and construction supply · Electrical and MRO · Food service distribution · Healthcare and lab supply · Aftermarket parts
See the three agents →
Agribusiness
Agribusiness and agri-processing
Grain and oilseed · Sugar and ethanol · Coffee and cocoa · Animal nutrition and feed · Fresh produce and packing · Fertilizer and crop inputs
See the three agents →
Not listed
The qualifying question isn’t your industry.
It is whether decisions in your operation span systems that were never built to reason across one another. If the following describes you, the industry label matters less than the shape of the problem.
Physical goods
Manufacturing or distributing something real, where a scheduling or allocation call has a number attached by end of week.
Big enough to feel it
Large enough that the complexity costs real money, and unwilling to wait out a two-year data program to fix it.
Accumulated systems
Multi-site, often multi-ERP, frequently inherited through acquisition. Nobody designed this stack; it arrived.
Start here
Bring your operation, not your industry code.
One session on the decision that costs you the most. If it isn't a fit, we will say so in that session rather than three meetings later.